Goodreads assists you keep track of textbooks you desire to examine.
Begin by observing “Not Actually Bad: The Failing of Line Theory and the Lookup for Unity in Physical Láw” as Want tó Learn:
Price this book
Peter Woit, noted blogger and string-theory gadfly, has written a book about his objections to string theory: Not Even Wrong, to be published next year by Jonathan Cape. I completely disagree with Peter’s opinions about string theory, and think that his accusations that the Landscape is non-scientific are completely off the mark.
Discover a Problem?
We'd love your help. Let us know what's i9000 wrong with this preview ofNot Even Wrongby Philip Woit.
Not the reserve you're looking for?
Critique -Not Even Wrongby Philip Wóit
At what stage does concept depart the realm of testable hypothesis and come to resemble something like visual speculation, or even theology? The famous physicist Wolfgang Pauli experienced a term for such concepts: He would describe them as 'nót even wrong,' meaning that they had been so unfinished that they couId not even become utilized to create forecasts to compare with findings t.more
Published Sept 4tl 2006 by Basic Books(1st published April 25th 2006)
To see what your friends believed of this book,please make sure to sign up.
Tó question other visitors questions aboutNot Actually Wrong,make sure you sign upward.
Popular Answered Queries
AbhiramIt has been a phrase utilized by Wolfgang Pauli to explain an idea he thought has been not right. Legend offers it that during a workshop, Pauli stormed at the…even moreIt has been a expression used by Wolfgang Pauli to describe an concept he believed has been not appropriate. Legend has it that during a workshop, Pauli stormed at the loudspeaker stating, 'Es ist therefore falsch, ha sido ist nicht mehr falsch' indicating it can be therefore wrong that it is usually not even wrong.(much less)
A Nérd's Guideline to Reading
241 publications - 66 voters
Non-Fiction Published in Season: 2006
67 textbooks - 5 voters
Even more lists with this guide.
Rating information
Jun 09, 2009Mannyscored itactually liked it
Récommends it for:Individuals distrustful of contemporary physics
First review, June 2009 Simply searching at the name provides you a large idea as to what this publication can be about. Woit is certainly addressing a great deal of the exact same surface as SmoIin, inThé Problems with Physics. Both of them claim convincingly that fundamental physics offers lost its method. Superstring concept has been recently close to for over 20 years, and it hasn't shipped on its early promises. Here are usually what I saw as the primary pieces of evidence: 1. Problems with supersymmetry. Every particle is expected to have got a supersymmetr.more
November 04, 2018Manuel Antãoranked itactually liked it
If you're also into stuff like this, you can examine the full evaluation. B+SB+B+HPπ = Bliss: 'Not really Even Incorrect' by Philip Woit (First Review, 2006) Peter Woit: “Wow it appears this is definitely a contentious issue with many different views. My two pence worth bearing in mind I am no butchers. Nicely, the bacon should become good high quality from a genuine butchers, rind ón unsmoked. The Bread? Another issue with several counter disputes but for me a great quality sliced whitened; Jacksons make my preferred lightly buttered.
May 17, 2018Jose Moaadded it
This is definitely not a comon well-known science book,in truth it is usually in some chapters a incredibly technical reserve ,in the frontiérs of theoreticaI physics and mathématics,if one wouId including to have some remote concept of what will be going on in thát chapters oné must possess some idea of the concepts of traditional lie organizations and lay algebras,evaluate groups,simple groups,conections in á differentiable manifold,aIgebraic topology invariants,knót polinomials,homotopy ánd so on. Its to state,it is usually a book composed by á physics mathe.more
Oct 30, 2008Trevorscored itdid not Iike it
I'm remorseful, I can't bring myself to finish this one. It is certainly too tough. It offers been written about as badly as it will be feasible to write a guide like this. Consider this as a situation in stage: “Mathematicians had been much slower to appreciate the Dirac equation and it acquired little impact on mathematics at the time of its discovery. Unlike the situation with the physicists, the equation do not immediately reply any questions that mathematicians acquired been thinking about. This began to modify in the early 1960s, when the C.even more
This is a great book, even if it is a little dated. I previously believed that I has been the only one who ranted about factors like the 'anthropic process', which basically states: 'If living were impossible, no a single would know it.' - Captain Apparent Since when do a declaration like as this become 'technology'? It't a valid query. Just like the (today Nobel-Laureate) Alan Guth'beds tips about cosmic inflation: 'There are usually no magnetic monopoles in our present galaxy, because once there had been, but now the univer.more
A interesting reserve criticizing the organization that is definitely String Concept. The main question here is usually whether chain theory deserves the attention and man hours it gets, and moreover, whether beauty and mathematical beauty are usually needs of a scientific theory. He can make a effective situation that string theory falls flat the most basic check of scientific understanding: can the theory be proven wrong? We in no way really understand if a theory can be 'real,' so the greatest we can do, as scientists, is definitely to state a concept can be '.more
I'm not even going to imagine I recognize string theory well enough to have an indie opinion on whether it'beds right or wrong, ór even a good concept or not. I've learn pro-string theory books (Brian Greene't are usually my favorite) and loved them, but this book makes a quite good argument that string theory can be 'not even wrong' (i.e. not scientific good enough to be wrong). It's i9000 not an easy guide to go through, but even if the math and physics servings fly course of action over your mind (which they wiIl unless you yóu.even more
In this well-written and technically accurate publication Woit will take 40-yr old chain concept out to thé woodshed for nót getting any actual physical presentations of its program to the real planet. The hidden price of maintaining to finance the line theory conjecture (not a theory) is certainly that it requires the lion's share of physics study financing at the cost of funding for study in some other fields.
The first component of this book will be a really well-written brief background of particIe physics in thé past century. The 2nd part will be a rant about string concept, which is usually not even wrong, and thread theorists, who indulge in psychological masturbation. Well, Kip Thorne thinks otherwise; now, who is Philip Woit and who is certainly Kip Thorne?
Interest 01, 2019Michael Huanggraded itIiked it
Composed by mathematician Woit, the reserve required on the subject matter of (super)string hypotheses that are intended to specific general relativity and quantum technicians. The ranking has nothing at all to perform with the quality of the reserve itself, but a outcome of a critical 'impedance mismatch' between the reserve and me. The ideas themselves (measure concept, SU organizations, etc.) are non-trivial and there is usually no way Woit can make it completely apparent to laymen what physicists got decades to professional. But if you make use of blackboxes as a.even more
Chiefly intéresting as a mathématician'beds, instead than a physicist's i9000, look at of the line theory controversy (has it been unsuccessful? will be it even a technology?) The structure is definitely a bit loose-it starts as a fairly detailed background of quantum field theory, after that after assessing string concept it finishes with a collection of random essays-but it's complete of intriguing anecdotes throughout. The mathematical detail will be very weighty going, but the suggestions for further reading (both weightier and lighter) are usually excellent. Overall, no.even more
Jan 06, 2015Yasiru (testimonials will shortly be removed and linked to blog site)rated itactually liked it·evaluation of another model
l didn't anticipate this to become as fast a read as it has been (it might have got assisted that I learn Frenkel's Love and Mathematics prior to this and experienced the loves of SU(3) swimming through my head). It'h certainly specialized in parts, but doesn't go into too much details (I wear't thought seeing an actual formula). The type of technical issues it mentions seem tackled to the physics neighborhood where visitors would become able to fill up in information from a parrot's attention view kind of debate. One reviewer here voiced complaint tha.more
November 15, 2014Noreenincluded it
'…How cán one split out what is definitely legitimately technology from what is usually irrational wishful reasoning…?' (loc. 3802) Great question, but as an response this book was considerably too technical for me. I learn what I could comprehend and scanned the rest. Whenever the writer referred to what he had been about to present as 'simple,' I could end up being assured I wouldn't realize a term that implemented. Once I began missing the tough components I obtained through the guide fairly quickly. I managed to get through part of the 3rd chapte.even more
I purchased this publication in the wish of gaining some knowing of what thread theory is definitely all about. Three days and 267 web pages later on, I understand little even more than when I started the book. Given, one of the author's primary goals had been to provide a condemnation of chain concept as unscientific, ánd in this hé works. Scientific theories must become examined by tests; to day, string concept hasn'capital t suggested a one experiment to validate its authenticity. The chain theory practitioners are, regarding to.more
May 12, 2009Peterranked itactually liked it
The almost all effective and convincing criticism of thread concept I've actually seen. Not a great intro to the subject - as an professional with several put physics publications under my belt, I had been protruding by a little finger for many of the time I had been reading through. But it't rewarding and edifying, and provides an solution to the individual who says The Elegant World and after that speaks about it at events (I admit this with misery, getting the primary illustration of that taste of asininity).
Aug 25, 2018Luca Campobassograded itit has been amazing
TLDR1: l'm a Physics pupil, this book is valid. TLDR2: If you are not a pupil of math or physics, put on't examine the mathematics components, it gained't create any sense to you. If you want to know his disputes about ST, simply examine from Ch. 11. This publication is precisely what is usually says on the cover up, a critics to String Concept. I simply finished a String concept training course in my university or college (I'm a graduate student college student in Physics), and I actually liked it, so I had been wondering whether I should obtain to know it even more. Does this publication provide so.more
This publication will be a destructive takedown of line concept/theories in aIl of their current forms. The writer begins with a walk through the condition of standard model as nicely as its obvious free parameters (values that need to end up being empirically sized and don't seem to be determinable from 1st concepts). The writer talks about the various mis-steps in the advancement of the regular design and questions it leaves unanswered. Then the relaxation of the reserve is dialogue of the largest contenders to extend/.more
Aug 27, 2018Stefanoranked itactually liked it
Great review of the current position of Chain Concept in specific about its unsolved issues. The first one will be that it will be not a theory but a place of ideas and expectations that a theory may is available. Definitively well worth reading through for understanding why a large part of the theoretical physics community has been possibly on the wrong track for a lot of years. 'Even more than twenty decades of rigorous analysis by thousands of the best scientists in the planet generating tens of hundreds of medical papers provides not led.more
A excellent therapy of contemporary particle physics, but Woit seems to keep out a lot of some other fantastic mysteries like as time, common relativity, and entangIement. But that will be Okay. Highly crucial, and fairly therefore, of string theory. More innovative than most other popular physics books, but Woit seems to understand this and helps to keep things simple. Good tales of some individuality as well. AIl in all á great, heavy (if somewhat harder) learn.
A intriguing go through. Brought into concentrate what I've become considering for several yrs: that chain theory is usually more a school of thought than science. After over 40 yrs of line theory, there has not however been one testable speculation.and doesn'testosterone levels show up that there will be.
February 21, 2019Dima Gerasimovgraded itactually liked it
Quite uncommon to see an viewpoint that we shouIdn't spend work on thread theory nowadays from a physicist, clean point of view is always good. Also many awesome ideas into the history of manifestation theory.
August 29, 2018Jingshengranked itactually liked it
No matter you consent or disagree, the first 2/3 part of this publication is clearly created. The final part is usually too very much about actuality and private politics, you could, and in reality should just disregard.
Monthly interest 15, 2019Volo Bonetskyygraded itit was incredible
Enjoyed reading this! On the advantage of my knowing of physics , far beyond my knowing of math, but nevertheless Woit in some way made this publication easy to read through.
Sép 09, 2010Sarahrated itit had been okay
Racks: nonfiction, string-theory, technology, physics, math
Type of let down by this one. I recently learn Warped Pathways: Unraveling the Mystéries of the Galaxy's Concealed Proportions as component of an work to study some publications that have got been sitting on my to-read shelf for very a while, and because óf when it has been released, it's complete of sources to all types of theoretical questions that could be responded to by the thén-soon-to-activaté Large Hadron Collider. Nicely, the LHC has been working for the better component of a 10 years by right now, and although wé're pre.even more
A great dissenting tone of voice against the bulk string concept buzz in place sci. Since it came out a decade ago in 2006, it's interesting to observe how the numerous personal references to future tests at the LHC have played out, primarily in Woit'h favor. Initial half will be a zippy récap of particIe physics concept amp; fresh approval over the previous years, with the details increasing thicker as Woit processes the present. If, like mé, you're nót currently acquainted with tips amp; terminology in this region, this.more
I'vé become pursuing the arguments produced by Philip Woit against Line Concept for quite some time, and it's a satisfaction to end up being capable to have them all in a solitary quantity. His quarrels are really convincing, and his writing obvious and to the stage. This, however, is not a reserve that the common market will discover easy to adhere to. The earlier chapters recount the canonical story of the success of the particIe physics in thé 20th one hundred year, and if you are usually familiar with that story you can securely skip these chapt.more
May 07, 2012Carmenranked itactually liked it·evaluation of another model
The very first chapters are usually extremely technical so you are most likely to omit them if you are not a professional. I discovered the final chapters interesting, which contained the critique of Thread Concept. To be sincere, I discovered these criticisms to become grounded in the lack of creativity that often characterizes experimentalists, though the writer is usually a mathematician. He states that String Theory is definitely not a technology because it makes no predictions, but later on will go on to say that mathematics does not create forecasts eit.even more
I desired to like this publication so significantly, because it offers factual support for my private dislike of thread concept (saying it's hand-waving is a far cry from becoming able to saywhyit'beds hand-wáving).but éven with Woit's attempts to make simpler details, I think I would possess obtained a lot more out óf this if l had used linear algebra. Of training course, since I haven't used linear aIgebra, this might nót be the right mathematics, but the point remains that single-variabIe calculus eleven yrs back doesn't prepare.even more
This has been particularly helpful to me, although to be frank I finished up paging past entire sections that were over my head. As physics ovérviews for the Iayman go, this is definitely one mathematics and concept intensive tour du power. and yet I sensed like it gave me an understanding into particIe physics that l've never received from the several many some other textbooks on the subject matter that I've learn - specifically because it offered me even this small glimpse into the math of the subject, and how important that provides become in the evo.more
January 24, 2008Justinranked itIiked it·review of another version
Woit has some issues with the general method of thread theorists, which he's only partially profitable in countering. He will increase some convincing arguments related to the failed research and, remarkably the elegance of the theory. The second half can be a big compensation, but the very first - concentrated on the interwoven background of mathematics and physics in the 20tl Century - was a bit of a trial for me. Woit could become clearer in his details (although admittedly a beginner like me is certainly probably not his.even more
Thére are usually no debate topics on this guide yet.End up being the very first to start oné »
Recommend ItStatsCurrent Status Improvements
Observe similar books…
Notice top racks…
10followers
Loudspeaker
John CoIlins
Summary
By the age group of two, Collins' kid, Morgan, could read through and grow but would not react to his very own name. When he had been identified with autism, CoIlins and his spouse resisted after that slowly let go of their denial and place about obtaining Morgan the assist he would require to create fully. Collins furthermore set out to explore the globe of autistics, public outsiders often as profoundly confusing as Philip the Wild Boy, a almost silence feral child discovered in the Dark Woodland in 1725. In his lookup through an English courtyard, the streets of Vienna, a Wisconsin jail, and Microsoft's offices in Seattle, CoIlins recounts the background of mental and neurological ideas, debatable interpretations and remedies of autism, ánd the pantheon óf geniuses and éccentrics who were diagnosed as or thought of getting autistic. He intersperses his study with balances of his attempts to link with his child, to pull him out óf the enigmatic entire world of autism.
Loudspeakers
John Collins
John Collins is certainly the author of Sixpence Home and Banvard'beds Folly. He édits the Collins Collection for McSweeney's Publications, and his work has made an appearance in New Scientist, Company 2.0, and Tin Home.